davidd (davidd) wrote,
davidd
davidd

Books 'n' Stuff

I was going to share my impressions of a book I finished reading, but I didn't get to it right away, and now the enthusiasm, and the immediacy, have waned.

I also have a list of 25 exciting vocabulary words from a second book I read. I was gonna do the "vocabulary word list" thing like I've done in the past, but, y'know, whatever.

I try to write down all the books I read. I only read fifteen books last year. In the past four years I've only read 53 books, or about 15 per year (but only 7 or 8 in 2007 for some reason). Here I am, supposedly instilling an appreciation for reading in kids, and I rarely read myself. That is, I rarely read books. I spend hours reading stuff on the internet. I dunno, is it the same? Are books necessarily better? There seem to be an awful lot of crummy books out there.

I saw a poster for the movie "Prison Train" on eBay again recently. I'm having my "Prison Train" poster framed, by the way. True, a crime film poster isn't really in keeping with the tiki room theme, which is where it will hang, but neither is the "Girls Town" poster, and that one looks really kewl hanging in the bamboo bedecked Room of Doom. It's gonna be sort of an "eclectic" tiki room.

Anyway, what's the deal with being able to find, at regular intervals, vintage original posters for an obscure, ultra-low budget, practically forgotten film from 1938 on eBay in surprisingly good condition, yet it's impossible to find a poster for "Oneechanbara," which was released this past April? I mean, you'd think, after 70 years, that "Prison Train" posters would be rarities, yet in the past 18 months or so I've seen four... five... no, six of them for sale at various web sites; yet, I cannot find an "Oneechanbara" (or "OneChanbara" or "Chanbara Beauty") poster anywhere. There are a lot of internet images of the poster, but no actual posters for sale that I can find.

Not that I'd necessarily buy one but, like, you'd think they'd be out there, somewhere.

I'm not getting nearly as much accomplished during this intersession break as I hoped or intended. Everything takes so long to do. And, yeah, I spend a lot of hours sitting here at the computer, mindlessly clicking through a comparatively small number of web sites. I guess it's been a couple of days since I checked LJ. Several of you have updated, and updated at length, over the past few days.

I just learned that a Russian business bought Live Journal, apparently a year ago. Now there are rumblings that LJ is about to go under, and that draconian cost-cutting measures are going into effect. Additionally, there seems to be some hubbub over Wikipedia, with internal power struggles among the directors and millions of dollars at stake. The internet, or the world wide web, or the World Wide Web (the style guides we used in my grad school classes said to capitalize World Wide Web because it's a proper noun. Is it?) is changing, isn't it? This comes as no real surprise to me, although it's something of a disappointment. There used to be all this talk about how the internet was going to make information so readily available everywhere, how it would change the world for the better, and all that utopian stuff. It's reaching the point where it's nothing but a big spamming portal, with computer viruses, spyware, and "identity theft" threatening users at every turn. Plus, everything's being monetized, and the projects which fail to generate uncountable millions or billions of dollars in quick profits are falling by the wayside.

This comes, as I said, as no real surprise. I was always, even back in my college days when Mosaic was "the application that you must be proficient with if you want to find a job in the future," a little bit annoyed by people (college students and college staff) waxing rhapsodic over the "unrestricted access to information" offered by the wor... I mean World Wide Web. Even then, knowing, just like now, nothing about anything, I would ask, "uh, isn't the internet kind of dependent on, y'know, wires, from the telephone companies? Couldn't they just, like, shut it off if they wanted to?" The series of cable breaks in the Indian Ocean indicates that yes, the internet is quite dependent on wires. And the increasing restrictions on bandwidth being imposed by service providers like ComCast is reminiscent of the Empire of America Online, when internet service was provided at a per-minute charge.

Whatever happened to America Online? Remember when they became so vastly huge and wealthy that they bought Time-Warner? That was insane! I didn't understand it at the time. Even puny-brained little me could see that AOL was already on the verge of collapsing, as "unlimited" internet service became more readily available. Remember when AOL was kind of its own little world? It seems, now, like that was a long, long time ago... but really, it wasn't.

Now, however, it seems that some of the giants of "free" service, like Yahoo and Wikipedia, are finding it difficult to finance their continued operations. What would the internet world do if Google were to close up shop? I still don't quite understand how Google makes money. What I do see, however, is that Google is already, from a practical standpoint, the only game in town when it comes to searching the web. I mean Web. I'm hearing desperate-sounding radio spots touting the features of Yahoo search, but I don't like those "features," because what the features really are, are "limits." Yahoo feeds you what they want you to see. And once they've finished off Yahoo, Google will be free to do the same thing.

What became of AltaVista? AskJeeves? (I never cared for the AskJeeves interface.) DogPile? There used to be a lot of search engines. But the World Wide Web used to be a lot smaller. There are a lotta web sites out there. Google seems to be able to scan a pretty good chunk of them. But, will they always? Who knows, they're a private company, they can do whatever they want... and they will, once they control the entire search engine market.

I always thought it was weird that Microsoft couldn't come up with a really killer search engine. I think MS wasted a lot of years trying to follow the AOL model. They wanted to control everything. Seeing as how their OS is in most of the computers out there, I don't quite get how they failed to nab a bigger share of internet "stuff." I don't know, is their MS-NBC news service still going? You don't hear much about it anymore.

I think the bottom line is, it's difficult to make sustainable income by providing information or services over the internet. LiveJOurnal... how do you make money from on-line journaling? Plaster advertising all over the site, or charge for use. I'd rather pay for use, up to a point, rather than look at advertising. But the number of people willing to pay twenty or thirty or more dollars per year for their "space" on a site like this is pretty limited. MySpace got so big because it was "free." I can't stand it because of the ads. Wasn't it Murdoch's News Corp that paid some-ungodly-sum to buy MySpace? How are they gonna make money from it? I mean, how are they going to make BILLIONS of dollars from MySpace? Even at the time they bought it, squaresvill schlub me was aware of the rumbles from "the 'net" that MySpace was on its way out, and that FaceBook was the place to be.

I've never even looked at FaceBook. Several of my friends have FaceBook pages. In fact, almost all of my internet contacts have a FaceBook page. How does it work? Is it advertising supported? Can you buy an ad-free subscription? It seems to keep growing, but, MySpace seemed to have unlimited potential, too. What makes FaceBook so d@mned cool that even my "reticent, private" internet friends have a page there? Am I missing out?

Prob'ly not.

I feel myself edging into an interWeb slump. Yeah, I spend a lot of hours on the computer, but I'm flicking between Plurk and Flickr mostly, and LJ a bit, and a couple of other hobby sites. What I'm finding is that it's getting difficult to read the news on the internet. Most of the news sites are going toward streaming video. I don't want some talking head giving me a dumbed-down verbal synopsis of things. I want to have big blocks of text full of facts to read through. That's getting harder to find.

It's kind of ironic. You have to be able to read to get information from the internet. Reading, however, is becoming a skill which fewer students are willing to master. This works to the advantage of the "gatekeepers," who are more than happy to spoon-feed pre-packaged video clips to the dulled-down masses. As the New Year commences, I've seen a number of stories prognosticating about the future of the internet and of society. My long-term prediction is that the internet will eventually become nearly text free. It will be almost exclusively video clips and flashing lights and game-like clicky-button interfacing. Alternately, and equally likely: the internet will mostly just stop. If Amazon and eBay are the only ones making money, the companies who put the wires on the poles to keep the thing going aren't going to find it worthwhile to subsidize the operations of a handful of profitable internet businesses. And users are becoming stingier and stingier. I read, almost every day, about people who refuse to pay for internet service, thinking that free Wi-Fi will be available everywhere.

There's a local coffee shop that provides free Wi-Fi. At the moment. They have pleading signs posted around their establishment more or less begging people to please buy a cup of coffee if they're gonna milk the Wi-Fi. Free Wi-Fi is still a rare commodity in my part of the country. Besides, it's not really free. Again, somebody's paying for the service. Who is going to provide free Wi-Fi for free, forever, for everyone? Who can afford to do that?

Uhm... what did I start off to write about?

Anyway, now I'm starting to get bummed out by all the corporate mergers and the expectations for endless double- and triple-digit percentage profit gains. It's not like I have anything worthwhile to say, but I'll be bummed when LiveJournal folds up. With so many people talking about it, I'd say it's pretty much a done deal at this point. Self-fulfilling prophecy, maybe, but yeah, it's gonna disappear.

I guess maybe I'll still see some of you back where I first met most of you, at the NewDream/StormWerks sites. Of course, voxmachina.com hasn't been updated in five months, and @!/usr/bin/girl only sparkles sporadically, once every two or three weeks (it's been at least a month since the last activity there). What further evidence do you need that the internet, at least as we've known it, is grinding to a halt?

I have fun at Flickr. I hope it manages to survive when Yahoo collapses into bankruptcy.

I hope Apple Computers can thrive without Steve Jobs. "Hormone imbalance," they say. I wish I could believe that were true. I wonder what's up with iTunes removing copy protection and lowering the price of most songs? Savvy business move, or desperation?

I need to get my life in order. I was thinking about my possessions today. I have too many. (Like, duhhh....) When I'm gone, someday, although probably not imminently, nobody's gonna care about all that stuff. And right now, all that stuff is serving, to a large degree, as both physical and psychological baggage. I should just... clear it out. I mean, it's just stuff, right?

Instead, I acquire more. "Ooh, that'd be neat to have, that'd be fun, that'd make me feel more like a cool person." None of that is true, is it? It's good to have a few neat things around, or a few totally impractical objects that you keep just because you like them. But... boxes full of stuff? What's the point of having it if it's hidden away?

I also need to organize my time. I need to stay on top of things at work so I'm not up against last-minute deadlines. I need to take care of the little things so they don't turn into big things.

Werk... yeah. I need to try to care, y'know? I mean, I do all right, most of the time. But I need to get re-enthused about werk, make the most of the time that I spend there... and not bring any of it home!

I need to get more exercise, and eat better. Breakfast yesterday was packaged Chex Mix and a Coca Cola.

I should try to write coherently, stay on topic, and format what I write with a clear beginning, middle, and end. I should try to write with a purpose.

I should turn off the computer and go to bed.

Maybe I'll type up that book review thing tomorrow.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 11 comments